فصلنامه پژوهش های کاربردی در مشاوره

ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس رتبه‌بندی حمایت در روابط صمیمانه-تجدید نظر شده (SIRRS-R)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

نفیسه زهرا مرزوقی 1
احمدرضا کیانی 2
حسین قمری کیوی 2

1 دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

چکیده
مطالعه حاضر باهدف بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس تجدیدنظر شده رتبه‌بندی حمایت دریافتی در روابط صمیمانه (SIRRS-R) انجام شد. روش این مطالعه توصیفی- همبستگی از نوع روان‌سنجی بود. جامعه آماری این مطالعه زنان و مردان متأهل ایرانی ساکن شهر شیراز در سال 1402-1401 با بازه سنی 18 تا 66 سال که حداقل یک سال از ازدواج آن‌ها گذشته بود و نمونه‌ای به حجم 251 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار این مطالعه، مقیاس 25 گویه ای رتبه‌بندی حمایت در روابط صمیمانه- تجدیدنظر شده (SIRRS-R) که توسط بری و همکاران (2009) توسعه‌یافته است، بود. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای(23)SPSS و AMOS انجام گرفت. نتایج محاسبه آلفای کرونباخ مقیاس کلی و هریک از خرده مقیاس‌های آن، ‌که بالاتر از 90/0 گزارش‌شده اند، پایایی داخلی عالی این مقیاس را نشان داد. نتایج بررسی روایی با استفاده از اجرای تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد که بار عاملی همه گویه ها بالاتر از 30/0 است که بیانگر روایی ساختاری مناسب می‌باشد و مقدار مجذور خی بر روی درجه آزادی (X2/df) که برازش کلی مدل را نشان می‌دهد، 79/1< 3 برآورد شده است و بیانگر این است که مدل به‌طورکلی برازش مطلوبی دارد؛ پس ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی
حمایت در روابط صمیمانه
روایی و پایایی

عنوان مقاله English

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale – Revised (SIRRS-R)

نویسندگان English

Nafiseh Zahra Marzooghi 1
Ahmadreza Kiani 2
Hossein Ghamari kivi 2
1 University of Mohaghegh ardabili
2 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده English

The present study aimed to standardize and investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Revised Rating Scale of Received Support in Intimate Relationships (SIRRS-R). The method of this study is descriptive-correlation of psychometric type. The statistical population of this study was Iranian married men and women living in Shiraz city in 1402-1401 with the age range of 18 to 66 years, who have been married for at least one year and have not separated, and a sample of 251 people was selected using available sampling method. The instrument used in this study was the 25-item the Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale – Revised (SIRRS-R) developed by Berry et al. (2009). Data analysis was done using SPSS and AMOS software version 23. The results of calculating Cronbach's alpha of the overall scale and each of its subscales, all of which were reported above 0.90, showed the excellent internal reliability of this scale. The results of examining the structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis showed that the factor loading of all items was higher than 0.30, which indicates that the factor loading of all items was significant and the structural validity was appropriate. Considering the calculation of the fit indices, the value of the chi-square on the degree of freedom (X2/df), which indicates the overall fit of the model, was estimated to be 1.79< 3, indicating that the model has a good fit overall.So, the psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of the scale were confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Psychometric properties
support in intimate relationships
validity and reliability
عبداله پور، محمد آزاد و شکری، امید (1398). تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و همسانی درونی پرسشنامه تعامل معلم. نشریه علمی آموزش و ارزشیابی، سال دوازدهم، شماره 45، صص: 70-51.
فرزین راد، بنفشه؛ رشیدیان، مریم؛ شکاری جویباری، زینب؛ دهقانی اشکذری، ابراهیم (1401). بررسی روایی و پایایی نسخه ایرانی مقیاس ذهن آگاهی فیلادلفیا (PHLMS) در مراجعان مراکز مشاوره و روان‌درمانی. فصل‌نامه پژوهش‌های کاربردی روان‌شناختی، دوره 13، شماره 1، صص: 362-345.
کلاین. پل(1392). راهنمای آسان تحلیل عاملی. ترجمه دکتر سید جلال صدر السادات و اصغر مینایی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
Barry, R. A., Bunde, M., Brock, R. L., & Lawrence, E. (2009). Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 48.
Beach, S. R., Whisman, M. A., Snyder, D. K., & Heyman, R. E. (2013). Practical tools for assessing marital or intimate partner relational problems in clinical practice and public health settings. Family problems and family violence: Reliable assessment and the ICD-11, 101-109.
Brock, R. L., Barry, R. A., Lawrence, E., Dey, J., & Rolffs, J. (2012). Internet administration of paper-and-pencil questionnaires used in couple research: Assessing psychometric equivalence. Assessment, 19(2), 226-242.
Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 39.
Buszman, K., & Przybyła-Basista, H. (2017). Polska adaptacja wielowymiarowej skali spostrzeganego wsparcia społecznego.
Charles, C. M. (2017). Work-family conflict: Does romance matter? (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 13(2), 99-125.
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053- 1073.
Collins, N. L., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Lobel, M., & Scrimshaw, S. C. (1993). Social support in pregnancy: psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(6), 1243.
Coyne, J. C., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Going beyond social support: the role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 54(4), 454.
Cutrona, C. E. (1996a). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Sage Publications.
Cutrona, C. E. (1996b). Social support as a determinant of marital quality: The interplay of negative and supportive behaviors. Handbook of social support and the family, 173-194.
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching.
Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication research, 19(2), 154-174.
Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1994). Social support communication in the context of marriage: an analysis of couples' supportive interactions.
Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., & Gardner, K. A. (2005). The Relationship Enhancement Model of Social Support.
Dehle, C. (2007). A new look at social support behavior during marital interactions: Are ratings of social support quality associated with marital quality and spouses' perceptions of social support?. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, 42, (pp. 147-173). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Dehle, C., Larsen, D., & Landers, J. E. (2001). Social support in marriage. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(4), 307-324.
Gardner, K. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (2003). Social support communication in families. In The Routledge Handbook of Family Communication (pp. 519-536). Routledge.
Haber, M. G., Cohen, J. L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B. B. (2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American journal of community psychology, 39, 133-144.
Ilska, M., & Przybyła-Basista, H. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of the Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale–Revised (SIRRS-R). Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(2), 139-153.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychological bulletin, 127(4), 472.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nd Edition. The Guilford Krejcie, RV, & Morgan, DW (1970). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2012). „Prawdziwych przyjaciół…”. Wsparcie społeczne, stres, choroba i śmierć [“A friend in need is a friend indeed.” Social support, stress, illness and death]. In H. Sęk & R. Cieślak (Eds.), Wsparcie społeczne, stres i zdrowie [Social support, stress and health] (pp. 29–48). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kurdek, L. A. (2005). Gender and marital satisfaction early in marriage: A growth curve approach. Journal of marriage and family, 67(1), 68-84.
Lakey, B., & Scoboria, A. (2005). The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self‐esteem. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 361-388.
Lawrence, E., Bunde, M. A. L. I., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., ... & Adams, E. E. (2008). Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 445-463.
Melrose, K. L., Brown, G. D., & Wood, A. M. (2015). When is received social support related to perceived support and well-being? When it is needed. Personality and individual differences, 77, 97-105.
Myers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA Niendam, TA, Laird, AR, Ray, KL, Dean, MY, Glahn, DC, & Carter, CS (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 241-268.
Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(2), 219.
Porter, E. (2017). Relationship Difficulties in Social Anxiety Disorder. University of Pennsylvania.
Porter, E., & Chambless, D. L. (2014). Shying away from a good thing: Social anxiety in romantic relationships. Journal of clinical psychology, 70(6), 546-561.
Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2010). The relation of perceived and received social support to mental health among first responders: a meta‐analytic review. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 403-417.
Reblin, M., & Uchino, B. N. (2008). Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Current opinion in psychiatry, 21(2), 201.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (1990). Traditional views of social support and their impact on assessment.
Sarrafian, N. (2020). Social Support in Intimate Relationships and Its Link to Relationship and Life Satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne).
Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International journal of psychology, 42(4), 243-252.
Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1991). Social support and health: A theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of social and personal relationships, 8(1), 99-127.
Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., Eldridge, K. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support in marriage: Translating research into practical applications for clinicians. The Family Journal, 6(4), 263-271.
Uchino, B. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on psychological science, 4(3), 236-255.
Uchino, B. N., Carlisle, M., Birmingham, W., & Vaughn, A. A. (2011). Social support and the reactivity hypothesis: Conceptual issues in examining the efficacy of received support during acute psychological stress. Biological psychology, 86(2), 137-142.
Vaux, A., Phillips, J., Holly, L., Thomson, B., Williams, D., & Stewart, D. (1986). The social support appraisals (SS-A) scale: Studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(2), 195.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52(1), 30-41.

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

ارسال مقاله

داوران

تماس با ما